A leading New York Times reporter said Democratic Socialists want to “take out our entire constitutional system,” and the group’s own platform backs that up with plans to erase core checks and balances.
Story Highlights
- New York Times reporter cited the Democratic Socialists of America platform on Bill Maher’s show as seeking to gut U.S. institutions.
- Reports say the platform would abolish the presidency and Supreme Court, placing them under Congress.
- Coverage describes plans to end the United States Senate and the Electoral College.
- DSA-aligned materials call for drafting a new constitution to build a “democratic socialist republic”.
What Triggered The Warning On National Television
Bill Maher’s program featured a discussion where the Democratic Socialists of America were described as seeking to “get rid of our form of government,” including the Senate, the presidency, and the Supreme Court. The exchange cited the group’s platform as the driver of that claim, not rumor or a leak. The warning came as a straight reading of the stated goals that appeared in reporting and public-facing materials tied to the platform’s rollout earlier this summer.
The television moment matters because it points viewers to words that have been widely reported as coming from DSA’s own platform. Those reports say the platform seeks to replace the presidency and the Supreme Court with bodies chosen by and under Congress. This would erase the separation of powers that protects liberty by design. It would also end the Senate and scrap the Electoral College, restructuring federal power around a single legislative center.
What The Platform Reportedly Demands In Black And White
Contemporaneous coverage summarizes the platform as a sweeping rewrite, not a routine reform bill. It describes a plan to abolish the Senate, eliminate the Electoral College, and replace two coequal branches with offices under Congress. That would hand one branch the power to pick and control the executive and the courts. Several outlets characterize this as a fundamental teardown of checks and balances that shield minority rights and the states.
Further reporting ties candidate endorsements to support for these structural goals. According to that account, candidates seeking DSA backing must support abolishing the Senate, the presidency as we know it, and the Supreme Court. If accurate, that links the group’s political muscle to a pledge for constitutional overhaul, not just policy tweaks. That raises the stakes for voters sizing up any contender carrying a DSA endorsement in 2026 races and beyond.
How DSA-Aligned Sources Frame The Same Agenda
DSA-aligned materials defend the program as democratic in method and goal. A DSA outlet explains that the end state is to “draft a new constitution” to create a “democratic socialist republic,” which supporters call a more representative system. That framing says change should come through constitutional politics. The advocates argue their aim is more democracy, but their remedy still replaces the current order with legislative primacy over the executive and the judiciary.
🔥 When they tell you who they are, believe them.
✨Jeremy Peters told Bill Maher that DSA candidates aren’t just Democrats; they aim to take over and dismantle the Democratic Party and the entire U.S. constitutional system!💥 https://t.co/l0kh2193sI— Monica (@MonBreeden) August 22, 2026
A local DSA chapter goes further, saying the present system does not serve working people and should be replaced by a “new and radically democratic constitution.” Their statement casts the United States as failing at democracy and urges an elected assembly to write a new charter. That posture admits the intent to swap out the existing rules of the game. The debate is not about minor fixes, but about refounding the nation’s basic structure.
Why This Matters For Conservatives And Every Citizen
Americans built the Constitution to divide power, slow rash change, and protect rights. Proposals to abolish the Senate, scrap the Electoral College, and place the executive and courts under Congress would erase those guardrails. Rural states would lose leverage. Presidents would become creatures of the legislature. Judges would lose independence. However one feels about DSA, the stakes are clear: these changes would remove the checks that defend liberty when passions run hot.
Bottom Line And What To Watch Next
The on-air warning pointed to published platform language and aligned statements, which is fair ground for scrutiny. Supporters claim a democratic pathway, but the destination still ends the balance our Founders designed. Watch for candidates who accept DSA endorsements and whether they back the platform’s institutional planks. Track any bills, amendments, or pledges that move from rhetoric to action. Voters deserve plain answers before anyone rewrites America’s Constitution.
Sources:
newsmax.com, youtube.com, dsacleveland.org, inkl.com, city-journal.org
